What to put in an ideal JoRD service
January 11, 2013 Leave a comment
The Feasibility Study has been asking researchers, representatives of Publishing Houses, repository staff and librarians about their image of an ideal JoRD service to give some sort of indication of how to build a resource that will be useful. So far, the most ideal service which would achieve the desires of all the stakeholders would not only include a database to contain all the details of every journal data sharing policy, cross-matched with funders requirements and lists of suitable repositories but also employ a team of human staff to constantly update the data base, provide customer service and advice about best practice and give educational workshops and seminars. This would be ideal, but expensive, and ideals cannot always be reached, at least not initially.
So, who wants what out of the service? These are the service requirements each stakeholder group suggested.
Researchers would like the service to:
- Have a clear, visual user friendly website with technical support, and information about the service and its scope
- Include summaries of policies, RCUK baseline policies, compliance statistics
- Include the URL of journal policy
- Provide contact details of researchers
Researchers told us that they would use the service to find the journal which is right for their data and funder’s requirements, find appropriate repositories and to look for openly accessed data.
Publishers asked for:
- A simple attractive web page
- An authoritative resource
- Compliance monitoring and sanction information
- Technical error reporting
- Guidance about best practice, current issues, changes and trends and a model policy
- A policy grading system
- Levels of membership
Publishers said that they would use the service to gather competitor intelligence, a source of advice and as a central resource to get information about funder’s requirements and accredited repositories.
Both researchers and publishers wanted:
- Guidelines about data submission, such as copyright, use licensing, ethical clearance, restrictions and embargoes and file format
- URLs of places where data can be archived and retrieved
As far as other stakeholders are concerned, librarians considered that the service could give publication and funding compliance guidance for researchers as well as support research data management policies. Funders thought that the service could track the development of Journal data policies and influence the data sharing behaviour of researchers. Representatives of repositories thought that a central data policy bank would be a resource where they could check consistency and compliance of journal data policies and possibly identify partner journals. It seems that a JoRD Policy Bank Service would have something to offer for everyone in the research industry. The quest now, as in all research activity, is finding someone who will pay, so that the ideal service will not be such a distant dream.