Online survey results part two
November 16, 2012
The second set of questions asked in the online survey ask for the opinions of researchers about data sharing and the usefulness of a data policy bank service. They are as follows:
- Where do you access or locate the research output of other researchers?
- In your opinion are the key drivers behind increasing access to research data?
- In your opinion what are the main problems associated with sharing research data?
- What do you think about linking a publication with digital data that are integral to its main conclusions?
- What do you think about linking an article with supplementary material that enhances the article?
- Do you think that journals should provide digital data sharing policies?
- Do you think there would be benefits in having a service offering information about journal research data policies?
- Would you use a service of this kind?
- What information should be included in a policy bank service?
- Do you have any other comments?
Most of the respondents locate other researcher’s data from colleagues or in their own institution or organisation and feel that the four most important key drivers to increasing access to data are:
- Increased access to data
- Increased efficiency of research resources
The most frequently expressed concern is that of attribution of intellectual property right to the data being shared. The next frequently expressed issue is that current institutional and establishment models and mindsets of institutions and some individuals create barriers to sharing data. However just over one-third of respondents (35%) consider that linking digital data as an integral part of main conclusions in published online journals would be useful and should be mandatory.
Linking articles to supplementary data to enhance the article was considered useful by more respondents (43%) but it would also depend on the context of the data shared. Over 74% of researchers considered that journals should provide data sharing policies and a similar percentage (73%) thought that such a service would be of benefit, because it would be a central resource. Nearly 80% of respondents said that they would use such a service, either to gather data, or as a means of selecting where to publish their work. Many ideas of what to include in a policy data bank were suggested, which included:
- Clarity and simplicity of use
- Archiving URLs
- Usage licences (eg Creative Commons)
Eight researchers commented that they considered the initiative important.
The least number of respondents said that they gather other research data from their own blog, or from hard copy data sets. The concerns expressed about sharing data were those of trust, confidentiality and the need to overcome existing mindsets and institutional barriers. A small number of researchers felt that sharing data would affect the future of research and that before sharing data certain conditions would have to be fulfilled. A very low number of people (3%) said that linking data to main conclusions was not useful and unnecessary; that they would only be interested in a published article, not in any additional material and that journals should not provide data sharing policies. One researcher commented that further research about the topic with a trial would help their decision as to whether published data sharing policies would be of personal benefit.
Three percent of respondents thought that there would be no benefit to a data policy bank service, because it is not needed, not feasible or there would be conflicting journal ethos. Twenty one percent considered that they would not use such a service because they did not find it relevant and one researcher stated that they would prefer to deal directly with the journal.
On balance, it appears that more respondents are pro-data sharing, have positive opinions about the JoRD policy bank service and would find it useful, than respondents who feel that there is no need or use for such a service.